District Judge Carl Barbier to override the council's LED Tube Manufacturer decision to get rid of the four statues on grounds that they are a public "nuisance" due to their Confederate affiliation."Regardless of whether the Civil War era is regarded as a catastrophic mistake or a noble endeavor, it is undeniably a formative event in the history of Louisiana," the suit says.C.Mayor Landrieu, brother of former Democratic Sen. and the Beauregard Camp No..S. 130, argue that two of the monuments are protected as listees on the National Register of Historic Places and all are safeguarded by laws that protect statues celebrating military veterans. It also alleges that streetcar projects in New Orleans funded by the U.The plaintiffs, Louisiana Landmarks Society, the Foundation for Historical Louisiana, the Monumental Task Committee Inc."The 51-page suit asks U.S. Mary Landrieu, has led the fight to take down the monuments following a mass shooting that targeted members of a historically black church in Charleston, S. The city council's Thursday vote to go forward with their removal was the first of its kind in the nation. Department of Transportation and Mayor Mitch Landrieu's office led to construction that damaged the monuments. "It is the source of much of the cultural heritage (of) this city and state, including countless novels, short stories, plays, monuments, statues, films, stories, songs, legends and Led Tube other expressions of cultural identity.Hours after the New Orleans City Council voted Thursday to remove four Confederate monuments from public property, a group of historic organizations announced a lawsuit against the federal government and mayor's office, claiming the statues are protected by state laws.
Bodies who do not own or airing a pet Log Splitterنظرات این مطلب
تعداد صفحات : 0
درباره ما
اطلاعات کاربری
آرشیو
خبر نامه
چت باکس
پیوندهای روزانه
آمار سایت
کدهای اختصاصی